Chartiq vs Tradingview – Which is the better trading platform for analysis?
Among the multitudes of trading platforms today, Chartiq and Tradingview stand out by providing rich charting and technical analysis capabilities for traders involved in stocks, futures, forex and more.
Both platforms offer many overlapping functionalities like advanced charting, technical indicators, drawing tools, watchlists and rudimentary social community features. However, there are some stark differences when it comes to data coverage, cost and intended target markets.
So between Chartiq and Tradingview, which trading platform enables better opportunities for market analysis?
Below we dive into an in-depth feature comparison to reveal their strengths and weaknesses.
Core Feature Comparison
| Chart types | Candlestick, line, mountain, baseline, hollow candlestick etc | Candlestick, line, area, bars, Renko etc |
| Chart timeframes | 1 min to 1 month | 1 tick to 1 month |
| Technical indicators | 80+ built-in indicators | Over 100 built-in indicators |
| Drawing tools | Trendlines, channels, fib retracements | All core tools plus pitchfork, Gann fan, Shape drawing |
| Hotkey shortcuts | No hotkey feature | Customizable hotkeys |
| How far back is historical data | Up to 19 years | Up to 40 years |
| Instruments coverage | 45,000+ US equities and futures | 70000+ global equities, futures, indices, forex etc |
| Pre-built screeners | No scanner feature | In-built screener with saved scans |
| Ability to code strategies | No custom strategies feature | Custom indicators and auto-trading via Pine Script |
| Backtesting capabilities | No backtesting feature | Robust strategy backtesting environment |
| Desktop platforms | Part of 3rd party platforms like MT4, Ninjatrader | Proprietary all-in-one desktop app |
| Cost | Typically expensive, bundled in 3rd party platforms | Freemium model starting from $14/month |
In India, zerodha provides both Chartiq and tradingview in their platform. They also have new beta version of tradingview 2.0.
Let’s analyze the major differentiators in greater depth:
Instruments coverage and data depth
Tradingview clearly has vastly greater market coverage tracking over 75,000 instruments across stocks, futures, forex, cryptocurrencies and more – over 50+ global exchanges. Coverage includes popular indices like S&P 500, emerging markets like India, China, Poland as well as asset classes like bonds, ETFs and CFDs.
In comparison, Chartiq mainly has strong coverage in US equities, lacking support for other key assets. Historical data also goes further back up to 40 years on Tradingview versus typically less than 20 years on Chartiq.
This allows traders to use Tradingview for intermarket analysis across asset classes as well as backtest historically across decades. Chartiq’s narrower coverage hampers this flexibility for traders needing consolidated research.
Built-in scanning and detection tools
Tradingview provides an intuituve stock screener to scan instruments using technical and fundamental data parameters across any global market. Scan results can be saved as actionable watchlists or alerts triggered programmatically.
Additionally, indicator values can directly drive color-coding of tickers and price-scaling. This visual approach makes it easier for traders to detect opportunities that match their technical strategy.
In contrast, Chartiq relies on data partnerships so scanning features would depend if brokers like MT4 expose it in their platforms. Within Chartiq itself, scanning tools don’t exist so traders may miss out on trading signals.
Coded strategy building and backtesting environment
A hugely powerful feature exclusive to Tradingview is Pine Script – a proprietary easy-to-learn programming language for coding custom stock indicators, strategies and bots that can then be backtested.
Pine Script enables traders to leverage Tradingview’s data and infra for analytics, alerting and automated trading by connecting their own algos. Hundreds of scripts shared by coders are also available for modification.
Meanwhile, Chartiq is purely for chart analysis so lacks a development environment for traders to enhance analytics beyond out-of-box indicators.
The result is Tradingview empowers traders to evolve custom trading systems shaped perfectly for their risk appetite rather than relying on generic formulas.
Cost of adoption
Tradingview manages to pack an astounding amount of analytical capabilities even in its free version like 100+ indicators, interactive charts, community access, paper trading and more.
Even mid-tier premium plans cost reasonable ~$15/month while providing power users advanced features like more server-side alerts, data streams via API, faster execution and Level II insights.
In contrast, ChartIQ requires integration into 3rd party broker platforms like Ninjatrader, TradingView and ThinkorSwim which have high basic costs ranging from $700-1500/year. So the operational costs for traders to access ChartIQ’s analysis tends to be steep.
As a pure platform, Tradingview hence becomes more attractive for individual traders on a budget while providing an abundance of natively integrated tools.
Based on the pros/cons analyzed, Tradingview emerges as the superior platform by current standards owing to its broader data support, custom development environment and cost effectiveness. The sheer depth of Tradingview’s consolidated feature set crafted specifically for traders gives it an edge.
That said, ChartIQ redeems itself by providing a responsive HTML5 charting library that can be neatly integrated across any website, app or platform owing to its flexibility. So it still retains value as a customizable charting component rather than holistic platform.
Now let’s review how traders can get the best mileage by using ChartIQ and Tradingview in tandem rather than as an either/or choice.
Synergizing ChartIQ with Tradingview
Instead of comparing Tradingview and ChartIQ as mutually exclusive choices, traders can harness their complementary capabilities for amplified success:
- Use Tradingview charts with Pine Script for broad market analytics since indicators, drawing tools are far more easier to access via UI thanChartIQ which relies on platform integrations
- Leverage Tradingview’s community ideas, smart money insights on markets to validate strategy before entering any position
- For actual trade execution, connect ChartIQ charts to broker account since it specializes in responsive UI/UX critical for order entries
- Use ChartIQ integrations with specific trading platforms like MT4 for order management after analytical research done on Tradingview
So in summary – Tradingview excels at market analysis while ChartIQ powers trade execution through brokerage account integration. Using both platforms in interplay takes advantage of their unique specializations.
This allows traders to harness the best aspects of both platforms for a true symbiotic workflow.
Conclusion
Evaluating between ChartIQ and Tradingview, Tradingview wins out as the more feature-rich, trader-oriented platform empowering smarter analysis with comprehensive data, coded strategies and community insights.
ChartIQ however retains merit as a nimble charting toolkit that can plug into trading interfaces for convenient order execution thanks to fast UI, navigator tool and API connectivity.
By using both platforms in tandem rather than as competing options, traders can shape an optimal workflow that enhances their end-to-end market research and trade management capabilities.
